diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1623')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1623 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1623 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1623 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7f213b7d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1623 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I've got this bug report about QEMU where vec_lde and vec_expte are producing wrong results semi-randomly. Let me try to figure out what category this falls into. + +First, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug is related to Altivec support in Rust's stdarch. So it's about vector operations. I remember that vec_lde and vec_expte are part of the Vector Load Doubleword Extend and similar instructions. These are specific to PowerPC architecture, which uses Altivec for vector operations. + +Since this issue arises during the implementation of Altivec support, it's likely a problem in how QEMU translates these vector instructions into something the target can understand. That sounds like an assembly lowering issue because it's about converting high-level code (like in Rust) to machine-specific assembly or handling the translation incorrectly. + +Alternatively, mistranslation could refer to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, but since this is within the same architecture but dealing with vector instructions, it might be more specific to how these vector operations are being handled during the lowering process. So "assembly lowering" seems appropriate. + +I don't think it's a performance issue because the problem isn't about speed; it's about incorrect results. It's not related to device, graphic, or network issues either. KVM is a hypervisor, but this is more about the emulation of vector instructions, which would fall under the handling of assembly code. + +So putting it all together, the bug is in how these vector instructions are being translated into the target architecture's assembly, making "assembly lowering" the correct category. +</think> + +assembly \ No newline at end of file |