1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/2958 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/2958
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..615b59cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/2958
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me go through the information provided step by step.
+
+The user mentioned that when installing WinXP-64, QEMU crashes with a specific error message involving vvfat. The error occurs during network setup after the installation has progressed quite far, which is frustrating because it forces them to restart from the beginning.
+
+Looking at the code snippet in the error: "../block/vvfat.c:105: void *array_get(array_t *, unsigned int): assertion 'index < array->next' failed". This points to an issue within the vvfat module of QEMU. The function array_get is failing because it's trying to access an index that's out of bounds, as indicated by the assertion.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories:
+- Mistranslation: Not relevant here since this isn't about source architecture mapping.
+- Assembly lowering (assembly): Doesn't seem related; this is a higher-level issue in block/vvfat.c.
+- Other: Possible, but I should check if another category fits better.
+- Device: This might be relevant since vvfat is part of the block layer, which handles storage devices. The crash occurs during file operations, which are device-related.
+
+Other categories like network, graphic, or kernel don't seem to fit because the problem arises in a block device (vvfat) and not directly in networking or graphics. The issue isn't about performance, permissions, or hypervisor-specific code either.
+
+So, the error is related to how devices, specifically storage devices using vvfat, are handled in QEMU. Therefore, the appropriate category should be 'device'.
+</think>
+
+device
\ No newline at end of file