1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1192780 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1192780
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7971c50b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/1192780
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided a detailed log where qemu-kvm fails with "Permission denied" when trying to open a disk image, even though both the backing file and the disk have 777 permissions.
+
+First, looking at the error message: it's about permission denial when accessing the disk image. This suggests an issue related to how qemu is handling file access or permissions. The user mentioned using the -snapshot option, which writes to temporary files instead of the disk image.
+
+I should check the possible categories again: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. 
+
+The error is specifically about opening a file with permission denied. This points towards an issue related to how qemu handles file permissions or access rights. The mention of apparmor in the logs indicates that there might be some security policy enforced by AppArmor preventing access, which could relate to kernel or filesystem permissions.
+
+However, since the problem occurs when using -snapshot, it's possible that the way temporary files are handled under this option is causing permission issues. Alternatively, maybe qemu isn't properly handling file descriptors or paths when snapshots are enabled, leading to denied access despite correct file permissions.
+
+Looking at the categories again, "files" and "permissions" seem relevant. But since the error is about accessing a specific file, perhaps it's more aligned with the "files" category, which deals with how files are handled by the application. Alternatively, if it's a permission-related issue deeper in the system (like kernel-level), then "permissions" might be better.
+
+But considering that the user has set correct permissions and is dealing with an access denial during file handling, especially when using a specific option (-snapshot), I think "files" would be more appropriate because it's about how the application manages files. Alternatively, if the issue is related to security policies enforced by the system (like AppArmor or SELinux), then perhaps it's under "permissions". 
+
+Wait, in this case, since the user has set the permissions correctly and the problem still occurs, it might be a bug in how qemu handles file access when snapshots are enabled. That could relate more to the application's handling of files rather than system-level permissions. So maybe "files" is the better category.
+
+Alternatively, considering that the error message is about permission denied, perhaps "permissions" is the correct category because it's directly related to access rights. But I'm a bit confused here because the user has set 777, so it's not a typical permissions issue but rather something else preventing access.
+
+Looking deeper, the apparmor status in the logs shows that there was an attempt to remove a profile for libvirt. This suggests that AppArmor policies might be interfering with the file access. If that's the case, then perhaps it's more related to system-level permissions or security policies enforced by the kernel, which would fall under "permissions".
+
+However, the bug report is about how qemu-kvm interacts with the files when using -snapshot. So maybe the issue lies within how qemu handles file descriptors or temporary files under this option, leading to AppArmor blocking access.
+
+Wait, but in the given categories, there isn't a specific category for security policies like AppArmor. So perhaps "permissions" is still the closest fit because it's about access rights and how the system allows or denies access to files.
+
+Alternatively, if the issue is within qemu itself, such as incorrect file handling when snapshots are enabled, then maybe it's under "files". But I think in this context, since the user has correct permissions but is getting denied, it's more likely a permissions-related bug, perhaps due to how the application requests access or how the system enforces policies.
+
+Hmm. Maybe I should consider that the issue is not with file handling within the application itself but rather with the system's permission checks when accessing files in certain modes (like snapshots). Therefore, "permissions" seems more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a situation where qemu-kvm fails to access a disk image due to a permission denied error despite correct file permissions. The issue is likely related to how qemu handles file access under the -snapshot option, possibly involving system-level security policies or incorrect file descriptor handling. Considering the categories provided and the nature of the problem, the most fitting classification is:
+
+**permissions**
+
+This is because the error pertains to access rights, even though the user has set appropriate permissions, indicating a deeper issue with how access is being managed by the system or the application.
\ No newline at end of file