1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2520 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2520
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..595eca02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2520
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is experiencing an issue where the QEMU display becomes blank with a message saying "Display output is not active" after waking up from suspend mode. They followed specific steps: generated an image, ran QEMU, suspended using S3 state, and then used socat to wake up. The system resumes but no display.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, I see options like 'display', 'graphic', and others. Since the problem is related to the display output after resume, it's likely a graphics issue. The message specifically mentions display output not being active, pointing towards a problem in how QEMU handles the graphical interface post-suspend.
+
+I don't think it's about device drivers or peripherals because the issue occurs with both a custom image and Ubuntu, suggesting it's more systemic. It's also not related to network, socket, or hypervisor issues as the display is purely graphical.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category here should be 'display' since it directly relates to the graphical output of QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the QEMU display becomes blank after waking up from suspend mode. The message "Display output is not active" suggests that there's a problem with how QEMU handles the graphical interface when resuming from suspend.
+
+Given this, the most appropriate category for this bug would be **display** because it directly relates to the graphical output and the display functionality in QEMU.
+
+```plaintext
+display
+```
\ No newline at end of file