diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1900779')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1900779 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1900779 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1900779 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..62dcd19b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1900779 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that using the commands xp /16i and xp /16x in Monitor mode led to confusing results when inspecting the ATAG structure. Specifically, they noticed that the DWords at address 0x120 were different depending on whether they used /16i or /16x. + +First, I need to understand what these commands do. The "xp" command is for examining memory, and the "/16i" likely stands for viewing 16 bytes as instructions (i), while "/16x" shows them in hexadecimal format. The user observed that the data displayed was inconsistent between the two views. + +Looking at the output, when using /16i, they get assembly-like instructions like "andeq r0, r0, r5", but with /16x, it's showing hex values. However, the DWords (double words) at 0x120 are different in each case. For instance, /16i shows 0x54410009 and 0x74736574, whereas /16x displays 0x54410001, etc. + +The user is confused because the same memory address should consistently show the same data when viewed differently. The issue seems to be that QEMU's monitor mode isn't correctly interpreting or displaying the bytes as either instructions or hex. + +Since the problem occurs in Monitor mode and relates to how data is being displayed after translation, it might be a mistranslation issue from the target architecture (which could be ARM here) to what's being shown on the user's x64 system. The commands are used for debugging, so if the translation is incorrect, it affects both assembly lowering and hex display. + +Considering the categories given, "mistranslation" fits because the data isn't correctly mapped from the target (ARM) to the user's view (x64). Alternatively, it could be an issue with assembly lowering, which is part of translating machine code to a readable format. But since the problem seems more about how the bytes are being interpreted rather than just assembly syntax, "mistranslation" might be the most accurate category. + +I don't see any other categories that fit better, like network or device issues because this is purely an examination command misbehavior. It's not a performance issue or related to files or permissions. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |