diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/2076')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/2076 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/2076 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/2076 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ee178a3f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/2076 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "stringop-overread warning in tests/tcg/multiarch/sha1.c". Let me break it down. + +First, the issue is a string operation over-read. That means there's an attempt to read beyond the bounds of a string or buffer, which can lead to undefined behavior or security vulnerabilities. The file mentioned is tests/tcg/multiarch/sha1.c. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +This warning relates to a bug in code that's part of QEMU's testing framework (tests/tcg/...). The file likely contains test cases for the SHA1 implementation. An over-read suggests it's an issue with how memory is being accessed, possibly during assembly operations or translations between architectures. + +The categories related to code translation and processing would be mistranslation or assembly lowering. Since it's a string operation in tests, maybe it's during the handling of data by the test cases, which could involve assembly-level operations or incorrect mappings from source to target architecture. + +Alternatively, it might not fit directly into these categories. But considering that it's an over-read warning, which is more about buffer handling rather than direct translation issues, but since it's in a multiarch test file related to TCG (Translation Code Generator), it could be tied to how code is being translated or optimized. + +I think "mistranslation" might fit because the bug occurs during the processing of architecture-specific code, leading to an incorrect access pattern. Alternatively, if it's about assembly lowering (optimizing assembly code), that could also be a possibility. + +But since it's an over-read in a test case, perhaps it's more about how the code is being handled during translation rather than the translation itself. Hmm, maybe it's better classified under 'other' as it doesn't fit into the more specific categories provided. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |