1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/assembly/942659 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/assembly/942659
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b52f5596
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/assembly/942659
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what the issue is.
+
+The user mentions that in QEMU version 0.15.1 and also in 1.0, there's a problem with the ARM Cortex M3 processor where "CPSID I" doesn't disable interrupts. They provided code snippets showing how the condition for handling interrupts was incorrect.
+
+Looking at the original code, it checks if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) and other conditions. It seems like the condition wasn't properly checking whether the interrupt should be disabled or not. The user then changed the condition to include a check for !(env->uncached_cpsr & CPSR_I), which means they're ensuring that the interrupt disable bit is set before allowing the interrupt to be processed.
+
+So, the problem was in how QEMU handles the PRIMASK and whether interrupts are being properly disabled. This relates to how the CPU's control registers (like CPSR) are managed during translation or lowering of assembly instructions into the target architecture's machine code.
+
+Since this is about incorrect handling of the interrupt disable mechanism, it falls under the 'assembly' category because it involves the mapping from assembly-level operations (CPSID I) to the correct behavior in the QEMU emulator. The bug was in how the CPSR_I bit was being checked during the assembly lowering process.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to incorrect handling of the interrupt disable mechanism, which falls under 'assembly' as it involves the translation and handling of specific ARM instructions.
+
+**Answer:**
+assembly
\ No newline at end of file