summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/726619
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/726619')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/72661923
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/726619 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/726619
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..470afbd9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/726619
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user mentions that "loadvm does not load (offline) snapshot anymore." They're using QEMU version 0.14.0 and noticed this issue with the current code from git master too. When they try to use "loadvm <snapshot-id>" in the monitor, nothing happens—no error message.
+
+They tracked it down using git bisect and found a specific commit that introduced the problem: f0aa7a8b2d518c54430e4382309281b93e51981a. Reverting this commit fixed the issue.
+
+Now, I need to figure out which category this falls under. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about loading a snapshot that was created while QEMU wasn't running. Loadvm isn't working as expected. It sounds like this is related to how snapshots are handled and loaded. Snapshots in QEMU are typically images, so perhaps it's an issue with file handling or image management.
+
+Looking at the categories, "files" seems relevant here because the problem involves loading a specific file (the snapshot). Alternatively, could it be under "other"? But since files directly relate to the operation of loading an image, I think "files" is more precise.
+
+Another angle: The function loadvm interacts with the monitor, which might involve some protocol or command processing. However, the core issue seems to be about the snapshot file not being loaded correctly, which points back to "files".
+
+I don't see any mention of performance issues, so "performance" isn't it. It's also not related to device drivers, graphics, networking, KVM hypervisor directly, or other categories listed.
+
+So, I'm leaning towards "files" as the category because it's about handling files (snapshots) when trying to load them.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues with loading a snapshot file, which falls under the category of file handling. 
+
+**Answer:** files
\ No newline at end of file