diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1350')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1350 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1350 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1350 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c6f80feb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1350 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed report about a regression in QEMU version 7.2.0rc3 where the snow effect from an EFI firmware no longer works as expected. + +First, I'll read through the problem description. It mentions that after updating to QEMU 7.2.0-rc1, the snow effect that used to appear on booting a virtual machine with a specific ISO doesn't show up anymore. The user expects this to be classified correctly. + +Looking at the steps to reproduce, it's clear that this is related to running a VM with a particular configuration and ISO. But since I don't have access to the VM or the ISO, I'll focus on other clues. + +The user provided a link to the QEMU bug tracker where they filed an issue, but the assistant doesn't need to go there. Instead, I should look at the provided information. + +They included the output from running 'qemu-system-x86_64' with some command-line arguments and showed that the snow effect is missing. They're asking for help in classifying this as either a bug related to the graphics (like VGA or GPU) or something else. + +I also see they mentioned possible tags: "bug", "graphics", " qemu ", and " vbox ". The assistant suggested it's likely under "graphics" because it affects visual output, but perhaps it's a broader issue with how QEMU handles certain operations. + +Now, considering the content of the bug report, the snow effect is a graphical phenomenon. It might be related to how the graphics are rendered or how the VM interacts with the host's display settings. Alternatively, it could be an issue with the specific ISO used, but since it worked before in version 7.1.x, the problem likely stems from changes in QEMU. + +Looking at the tags, "graphics" seems appropriate because it directly affects visual output. The other tags like "qemu" and "vbox" are more about the software or platform being used, which is relevant but secondary to the main issue of the graphical effect not showing up. + +I think the classification should primarily be under "graphics" as that's the most specific category for this type of bug. It helps in categorizing issues properly so that developers can address them based on their expertise. +</think> + +The issue described appears to be related to a graphical anomaly, specifically the absence of the expected snow effect when booting a virtual machine with a particular configuration. Given that the problem is tied to visual output and behavior in QEMU, it would be most appropriately classified under "graphics." This classification helps in identifying the nature of the bug and facilitates its proper handling by developers specializing in graphical issues within QEMU. + +**Answer:** + +The issue should be classified as related to **.graphics**, as it pertains to a visual anomaly in the virtual machine's output. \ No newline at end of file |