1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1907 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1907
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..add91f2f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1907
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU and the LoongArch architecture. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user describes that after enabling LASX in QEMU, booting Gentoo Linux with glibc optimized for LSX and LASX fails at systemd. They provided kernel panic logs showing an issue during boot. When they disable LASX, it works fine, so the bug seems tied to LASX being enabled.
+
+Looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, etc. The problem involves QEMU's CPU configuration and glibc's optimized code for LoongArch. Since enabling LASX causes a crash, it likely relates to incorrect translation of LASX instructions in QEMU.
+
+Mistranslation would mean that QEMU isn't correctly handling the LASX instructions when generating the target code. Alternatively, it might be an issue with how assembly is being lowered (translated) from the host's instruction set to LoongArch's. However, given that it's a CPU configuration flag in QEMU and relates to specific instruction sets, mistranslation seems more likely because it directly affects how instructions are handled during emulation.
+
+Other categories like device or graphic don't fit since this is about CPU behavior. The error occurs at the system level during boot, pointing towards an issue with instruction handling rather than hardware devices.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates that enabling LASX in QEMU leads to a crash when running Gentoo Linux with optimized glibc for LoongArch. This suggests an issue with how QEMU translates or handles LASX instructions.
+
+**Answer:** The bug is classified under **Mistranslation**.
\ No newline at end of file