summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1865
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1865')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/186517
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1865 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1865
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6f888c5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1865
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user provided an error message during installation: `cc_calc_addu: assertion failed: (carry_out <= 1)`. The issue occurs in a file related to s390x architecture, specifically `target/s390x/tcg/cc_helper.c`. 
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The error is in a CC helper function, which likely relates to carry calculation in arithmetic operations.
+
+The s390x architecture's carry handling is part of the CPU model emulation. Since this is during post-installation setup and involves an assertion failure in the TCG (Translation Coupled Guest) code for s390x, it points to a problem with how instructions are being translated or handled at the machine level.
+
+This doesn't seem like a network or socket issue. It's more related to how QEMU emulates the CPU instructions correctly. Since it's an assertion failure in the carry_out calculation, it might be due to incorrect translation from the source architecture (s390x) to the target, which falls under the 'mistranslation' category.
+
+Alternatively, it could also relate to assembly lowering if the problem is in how assembly code is converted into the intermediate representation. But given that it's a carry_out issue specific to s390x, I think 'mistranslation' is more appropriate as it involves incorrect handling of the architecture's semantics during translation.
+
+I should make sure there isn't another category that fits better. The other options like 'device', 'network', or 'kernel' don't seem relevant here because the issue is at a lower level—CPU instruction handling. So, I'm confident that 'mistranslation' is the correct category.
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file