diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1902451')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1902451 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1902451 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1902451 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e8e18c8c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1902451 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm looking at this bug report and trying to classify it into one of the given categories. The user is having an issue with QEMU where certain CPU features aren't being detected correctly. They're using a x64 kernel and checking for features like vmcb_clean or constant_tsc. + +From their description, when they run QEMU with these features enabled, it throws errors saying the host doesn't support them. However, looking at /proc/cpuinfo shows that the CPU (AMD Ryzen 5 3500U) does have the flags for constant_tsc and other relevant features. They also checked using cpuid and the AMD manual, confirming that these bits are set. + +So, QEMU is not recognizing the host's support for these features, which it should since they're present. The user provided their CPU info and the specific QEMU commands they used, leading to the errors about missing features. + +The possible categories include mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like 'other'. + +I think this is related to how QEMU detects CPU features. Since the user's host supports these features but QEMU isn't recognizing them, it might be a problem with feature detection in QEMU's CPU handling. It could be an issue with how QEMU maps or detects certain CPUID bits. + +Looking at the categories, 'mistranslation' refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which could be relevant if QEMU isn't correctly interpreting the CPU features. Alternatively, it might fall under a specific category like KVM since they're using KVM with '-enable-kvm'. However, the main issue is that QEMU isn't detecting existing features, so I'm leaning towards 'mistranslation' because it's about incorrect handling of feature flags during processing. + +But wait, another angle: if the problem is in how QEMU handles CPUID information, maybe it's a lower-level issue. Could it be related to assembly lowering or something else? The error seems more about missing features not being properly recognized rather than translation issues. But 'mistranslation' might still fit because it's about the mapping of CPU features from the host to QEMU's understanding. + +Alternatively, is there another category that fits better? Since the issue is specific to KVM and CPU feature detection, perhaps it's under 'KVM'. But I'm not entirely sure. However, 'mistranslation' seems to align more with incorrect handling of the features during processing rather than a broader KVM issue. + +So, after considering, I think 'mistranslation' is the correct category because it deals with how QEMU processes and maps CPU features from the host. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an issue where QEMU fails to recognize CPU features that are present on the host. This suggests a problem in how QEMU detects or handles these features, likely related to incorrect mapping or processing of CPUID information. + +**Answer:** + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |