diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2286')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2286 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2286 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2286 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..49ad5ca5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2286 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have this bug report to classify for QEMU. The title is "QEMU RISC-V TCG: amo insn fault does not throw AMO fault." Let me break it down. + +First, the mention of QEMU tells me it's related to an emulator or virtualizer. RISC-V is a specific instruction set architecture that QEMU supports. TCG stands for Translation-Caching Guest, which is part of QEMU's approach to emulate instructions by translating them into host machine code. + +The bug is about "amo insn fault not throwing AMO fault." I'm not super familiar with RISC-V instructions, but I recall that amo (atomic memory operations) are used for atomic read-modify-write operations. The issue here seems to be that when an amo instruction causes a fault, the expected AMO fault isn't being thrown. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The bug is about how QEMU handles a specific instruction's fault in RISC-V. It's related to the translation or handling of that instruction by the TCG. Since it's not throwing the expected fault, it might be an issue with how the instruction is being translated into the target architecture (host) code. That sounds like a mistranslation because the semantic mapping from source to IR/target isn't correct—it's failing to handle the exception as intended. + +Alternatively, it could be an assembly lowering issue if it's about converting higher-level instructions to machine code incorrectly. But the key here is that the fault isn't being triggered, which points more towards translation rather than just assembly generation. + +Other possibilities like device or peripherals don't fit because this is a CPU instruction handling issue. So I think 'mistranslation' is the best category for this bug. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |