diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/1888467')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/1888467 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/1888467 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/1888467 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5d59b303 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/1888467 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's read through the problem again. + +The user is reporting an inconsistency in file sizes when using `qemu-img convert` with HTTP compared to local conversion. They used the same source image (40G raw format) but got different results: 19G via HTTP and 3G locally. The affected formats are VHD, VDI; others like QCOW2 and VMDK are fine. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Hmm. The issue seems to be related to how `qemu-img` handles HTTP transfers versus local files during conversion. It's not about translation between architectures or assembly code. It doesn't fall into device, graphic, socket, etc. But network could be a possibility since it involves HTTP, which is over the network. + +Wait, but the problem isn't with networking functionality per se, like connectivity issues or packet handling, but rather how file sizes are determined when accessing via HTTP vs locally. That might relate to how QEMU reads files over HTTP versus local storage. + +Alternatively, it could be a performance issue because fetching over HTTP might involve different caching or block transfer mechanisms, affecting the output size calculation. But I'm not sure if that's directly about performance. + +Another angle: maybe when accessing via HTTP, the sparse file handling is different, leading to a different size being reported. Or perhaps there's an issue with how QEMU streams the data over HTTP versus reading it locally, causing the converted image size to differ. + +Since the user mentioned specific formats (VDI and VHD) having issues while others don't, it might be related to how those formats are written when the input source is accessed via HTTP. Perhaps there's a bug in the conversion process that depends on whether the source is local or remote. + +Looking at the categories again, 'network' seems like the closest fit because it involves using HTTP, which is a network protocol. The issue isn't directly about the device, graphics, sockets, etc., but rather the method of accessing the file (HTTP vs local) leading to different results. + +So, I think the category should be 'network'. +</think> + +network \ No newline at end of file |