1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/602336 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/602336
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3f7e5b61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/network/602336
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is experiencing poor network performance in their virtual machines running on KVM under QEMU. They mention that when they run iperf tests, the VMs only achieve about 3.23 Gbits/s compared to the host's full 10Gbit capability. They've tried different NIC types (virtio and e1000) and even tested with vhost_net without success.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The issue is clearly related to network performance within the VMs. They're not having issues with other functionalities like graphics or input/output; it's specifically about how fast data can transfer over the network.
+
+They also tried using different network drivers and configurations but didn't see improvement, which suggests it's a deeper issue with how QEMU/KVM handles high-speed networking. The fact that they mentioned upgrading their kernel and testing vhost_net implies they're trying to optimize the virtualization layer, possibly pointing towards a hypervisor or KVM-related performance issue.
+
+However, since the problem is directly about network bandwidth within the VMs, it's more specific than just KVM or hypervisor in general. The categories don't have a 'network' subcategory that I initially considered, but looking back, yes, 'network' is one of the options. Therefore, the most fitting category here would be 'network' because the issue pertains to the network performance between the host and guest VMs.
+</think>
+
+network
\ No newline at end of file