1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1660599 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1660599
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..80cd5717
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1660599
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user reports that version 2.8.0 won't compile if the g++ compiler doesn't recognize the "-fstack-protector-strong" option. They gave an example where Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) uses g++ 4.8.5 and gets a syntax error, whereas in Ubuntu Xenial (16.04), with g++ 5.4.0, it compiles fine.
+
+First, I should think about what each category means. The categories provided are:
+
+- mistranslation
+- assembly
+- other
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+- hypervisor
+
+Looking at the bug, it's related to compilation. The issue arises because a specific compiler option isn't recognized by an older version of g++. This is causing QEMU not to compile correctly on some systems.
+
+The problem doesn't seem to be with how code is translated (mistranslation) or assembly lowering (assembly category). It's more about the build process and compatibility with different compilers. 
+
+Other possibilities like device, graphic, network, etc., don't fit here because they relate to functionalities rather than compilation issues. Similarly, kernel, hypervisor, and others are not related.
+
+The issue is specifically about compiler flags and version compatibility. Since "-fstack-protector-strong" was introduced in a later g++ version (I think it's part of newer C++ standards support), older versions don't recognize it. This causes build failures on systems using older compilers.
+
+Therefore, this doesn't fit into any specific category like performance or permissions; it's more about the build process and compiler support. The categories provided might not have a perfect fit, but "other" seems appropriate because it's a general compilation issue that isn't covered by other specific categories.
+
+Wait, another thought: sometimes build issues fall under "mistranslation" if they relate to how code is translated into IR or target code. But in this case, the problem is with a compiler flag not being recognized, which is more about the build system's configuration rather than translation semantics. So maybe it's better categorized as "other."
+
+Yes, I think "other" is the most accurate category here because it's a general issue related to compiling QEMU and isn't tied to any specific component or feature within QEMU itself.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about a compilation error due to an unrecognized compiler flag in older versions of g++. This doesn't fit into categories like mistranslation, assembly, or others related to functionality. It's more about build compatibility.
+
+**other**
\ No newline at end of file