diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1857449')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1857449 | 31 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1857449 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1857449 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..559d3aa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1857449 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that after running QEMU with x86_64 and -nographic, the host terminal's line wrapping stops working correctly. They have to reset it or use tput smam to fix it. + +First, I'll break down what the issue is. It's about the terminal state being altered after QEMU exits. The problem occurs specifically with the -nographic option, which likely affects how QEMU interacts with the terminal. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is related to the terminal's behavior after using QEMU. Since -nographic probably affects how QEMU handles output and input, it's possible that QEMU isn't properly restoring the terminal state when it exits. This doesn't seem to be a translation error between architectures or assembly code; instead, it's more about how the terminal is managed during and after the simulation. + +The categories like graphic or device might come into play if this were a display issue, but here the problem is specifically with terminal behavior—line wrapping, cursor position, etc. That makes me think it's related to how QEMU interacts with the host's console or terminal handling. + +Another angle: When you run a full system simulation with -nographic, QEMU probably takes over certain aspects of the terminal, and upon exit, it doesn't restore the original state correctly. This could be due to how QEMU handles ioctl calls or other terminal control functions. + +Looking at the possible categories again, "other" is a catch-all, but I should check if there's a more specific category that fits. The issue isn't related to networking, sockets, or VNC. It's not about kernel modules or performance. Since it's about the terminal state after QEMU exits, maybe it falls under "graphic" because terminals are part of the graphical interface. However, sometimes terminal handling is considered a lower-level interaction. + +Wait, in QEMU, when you use -nographic, it likely disables some graphics-related features and uses text output differently. So perhaps the bug affects how the terminal's line wrapping is managed after QEMU exits. This could be due to incorrect ioctl calls or not resetting certain terminal modes properly. + +Given that the problem occurs with the terminal's line wrapping, which is a console feature, it might fall under "graphic" as it relates to display behavior. Alternatively, since it's about terminal handling, perhaps "other" is more appropriate because it's a specific interaction issue rather than a broader category like graphic or network. + +But wait, in QEMU, the -nographic option probably affects how the emulator interacts with the host's display and terminal settings. So maybe this relates to the way QEMU handles the host's console after the emulation ends. This might be classified under "graphic" since it involves display behavior, even though it's a text terminal. + +Alternatively, if it's about restoring the terminal state correctly upon exit, perhaps it's more of an input/output issue rather than strictly graphic or device-related. So maybe "other" is the safest category here because it doesn't fit neatly into the other specific categories like network, kernel, etc. + +But I'm still a bit unsure. The problem is about the terminal not wrapping lines after QEMU exits. That seems related to how QEMU interacts with the host's tty, which might be part of the "graphic" category since it's display-related. Alternatively, if there's no specific category for terminal handling, then "other" would make sense. + +After considering all this, I think the most appropriate category is probably "other," as the issue isn't directly tied to a specific major component like network or kernel but rather an interaction with the host environment that doesn't fit neatly into other predefined categories. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where running QEMU alters the host terminal's line wrapping state, which doesn't fall neatly into any of the more specific categories. Therefore, the best classification is: + +other \ No newline at end of file |