1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1721275 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1721275
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1c12f195
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1721275
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user starts by saying it's an enhancement request, not a bug per se. They're asking if QEMU can support more ARM CPUs, specifically listing several Cortex models like M0, M4, and so on. They mention using QEMU for GCC validation to ensure code generation is correct for the target CPU.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+This isn't about translating code incorrectly (mistranslation) or assembly issues. It's more about adding support for new hardware models. Since it's about adding ARM CPU support in QEMU, which is a hypervisor or emulator managing virtual machines and devices, the right category should be 'peripherals' because they're adding support for specific hardware components (CPUs). Alternatively, since it's about supporting additional CPUs, maybe 'device' would fit, but 'peripherals' seems more precise as it refers to hardware components.
+
+Wait, the categories also include 'hypervisor', but that's more about the virtualization layer itself rather than the devices it supports. So I think 'peripherals' is better here because they're talking about adding support for specific CPU peripherals or models.
+</think>
+
+The user is requesting support for additional ARM CPUs in QEMU, which relates to hardware components (CPUs) being supported as peripherals.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file