1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/92 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/92
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e9cc18c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/92
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug report is: "usb devices shouldn't have same vendor/product ID and same serial". 
+
+First, I'll break down what's being reported here. It seems like there's an issue with USB devices in QEMU where they're sharing the same vendor ID, product ID, and serial number. This could lead to problems because each USB device is supposed to have unique identifiers to function correctly within a system.
+
+Looking at the list of possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. 
+
+I know that QEMU deals with emulating hardware devices, so "device" seems relevant here since USB is a type of hardware peripheral. However, the category specifically has "peripherals" as an option, which would be more precise than just "device". But checking the list again, I see "peripherals" isn't listed—wait, no, actually it's there under the initial list.
+
+Wait, let me check: the categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. So "peripherals" is indeed one of them.
+
+The issue is about USB devices having duplicate IDs and serials, which relates to how QEMU handles USB peripheral devices. Therefore, the appropriate category should be "peripherals".
+
+I think I'm confident with this classification because it's directly related to hardware device management in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file