diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1b84c2e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1371 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU related to the BLSMSK instruction. Let me read through the problem description again to understand what's going on. + +The user provided an example where they compiled some assembly code that uses the BLMSMK instruction with specific operands. When executed, there's a discrepancy between the CPU result and QEMU's result regarding the carry flag (CF). The CPU shows CF as 0, while QEMU shows it as 1. + +Hmm, BLSMSK is an x86 instruction used in bit manipulation, part of the BMI2 extensions if I recall correctly. It sets a mask based on the trailing zeros in the source operand. So, any issues here would likely be related to how QEMU emulates this specific instruction. + +Looking at the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. Since the problem is directly tied to an assembly instruction (BLSMSK) not behaving as expected compared to a real CPU, it's about how that particular instruction is handled in QEMU. So, the bug is in the implementation of that instruction within QEMU. + +Therefore, this falls under the "instruction" category because it's specifically about the handling of an instruction leading to incorrect results. +</think> + +The issue pertains to how QEMU handles a specific x86 instruction (BLSMSK), causing incorrect behavior compared to real CPUs. + +instruction \ No newline at end of file |