1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1793119 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1793119
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c4b98027
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1793119
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user provided a detailed description about floating-point operations on AArch64 hardware versus emulation in QEMU. 
+
+The problem is that when FPCR is set to zero (which should make the FPU IEEE-754 compliant), the results of division operations differ between real hardware and QEMU. Specifically, after setting FPCR to zero, the result 'r' doesn't match the expected 'q' in QEMU, but it does on actual hardware.
+
+I need to categorize this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me think about each category:
+
+1. **Instruction**: This would involve an issue with how a specific instruction is handled by QEMU's emulator. Since the problem arises during a floating-point division (fdiv), which is an AArch64 instruction, it might fall here.
+
+2. **Syscall**: If the bug were related to system calls or interactions between user and kernel space, this category would apply. But in this case, the issue seems to be with the execution of an FPU instruction, not syscalls.
+
+3. **Runtime**: This is a catch-all for other runtime errors that don't fall into the first two categories. However, since the problem specifically points to the handling of the fdiv instruction under certain FPCR settings, it's more about instruction emulation.
+
+The user mentioned that using another OS also shows the same issue between real and QEMU, which suggests it's not an environment-specific problem but rather how QEMU emulates the instruction. Therefore, this is likely a faulty instruction handling in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file