diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b3dea627 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/2262 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU's Linux-user mode emulation for RISC-V32. They mentioned that when they run background jobs in a chroot environment, the shell hangs indefinitely. + +Looking at the details, they provided two code examples: `simple_shell.c` and `loop.c`. From what I understand, the shell is supposed to handle background processes by using `wait4` or `waitpid`, but it's not working as expected on RISC-V32 under QEMU. + +The strace output shows that there are repeated calls to `waitid` with flags like WNOHANG, which means it's checking for any completed child processes without blocking. The fact that it returns 0 repeatedly suggests that no processes are completing or being signaled correctly, leading the shell to loop indefinitely. + +In their reproducer, they mention that when they run a background job (like `./loop &`), the shell incorrectly reports that the job is done and then gets stuck in an infinite loop. The output shows `wait4 ret: 98298`, which doesn't make sense because on x86_64 or RISC-V64, it should return 0. + +So, considering the categories provided—instruction, syscall, runtime—the issue seems to revolve around how QEMU is handling system calls related to process management. Specifically, `waitid` and `wait4` are syscalls that aren't behaving as expected under emulation for RISC-V32. This would fall under a problem with system call handling in QEMU. + +Therefore, the category should be 'syscall' because it's an error in how these particular syscalls are being processed. +</think> + +The issue pertains to incorrect handling of `waitid` and `wait4` syscalls in QEMU's RISC-V32 emulation, causing background processes not to be managed properly. This is a system call-related problem. + +sys \ No newline at end of file |