diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..18febe9f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/833 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what's happening here. + +The problem is about the `sendmsg` system call failing in QEMU when there's no iov but ancillary data is present. In a normal Linux environment, it works fine, but under QEMU, the message without iov isn't sent, which causes issues for applications like the `ell` library that rely on this functionality. + +Looking at the steps to reproduce, they mention using `strace` and seeing that in QEMU, one of the `sendmsg` calls is missing. This suggests that QEMU isn't handling the `sendmsg` call correctly when the message has no data but includes ancillary information. + +The key point here is that the issue revolves around how QEMU handles a specific system call (`sendmsg`) with certain parameters. It's not about an incorrect instruction being executed or a runtime error like a segmentation fault; it's more about the syscall itself not behaving as expected in the emulator. + +So, considering the categories: + +- **Instruction**: This would relate to processor-level issues or incorrect assembly instructions, which doesn't seem to be the case here. +- **Syscall**: This involves how system calls are handled by the kernel or emulator. Since `sendmsg` is a syscall and the issue is about its behavior in QEMU, this fits. +- **Runtime**: This would cover errors that occur during program execution but aren't tied to specific syscalls. Again, since the problem is specifically with `sendmsg`, it's more aligned with syscall issues. + +Therefore, the bug is likely related to how QEMU emulates the `sendmsg` system call when certain parameters are provided. +</think> + +The issue pertains to how the `sendmsg` system call is handled in QEMU under specific conditions. This falls under how the system call is processed rather than an instruction-level or runtime error. + +sys \ No newline at end of file |