diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1068900')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1068900 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1068900 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1068900 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5c7d8387 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1068900 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to work through this problem step by step. So, there's this issue with QEMU where thread cancellation isn't working properly when using app-level emulation. The user provided some details about how Linux handles certain signals and how QEMU is causing problems because it's interfering with those signals. + +First, I need to understand what the bug report is saying. It mentions that thread cancellation uses realtime signals in userspace on Linux. Realtime signals are numbered from SIGRTMIN to SIGRTMAX, and they're typically used for things like asynchronous notifications. But QEMU seems to be stealing some of these signals for its own use. That means when an application being emulated by QEMU tries to use these signals (like for thread cancellation), it doesn't work because QEMU has taken them over. + +The problem is that the signal handler can't be set in the guest application because when you try to use sigaction on the host, it rejects those signals. Also, sending these signals doesn't reach the emulated application but instead affects the libc/libpthread code running on the host, causing QEMU to crash. + +Now, the user suggests a solution where QEMU steals one realtime signal for itself and then multiplexes the other signals through this stolen one. This way, applications can still use all their realtime signals without conflict. + +Okay, so looking at the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. The question is asking to classify this bug report under one of these. + +The issue here isn't directly about a faulty instruction (so not instruction), nor is it specifically about an error with a system call (syscall). It seems more like a problem that occurs during runtime when handling signals and thread cancellation within the emulation environment. So, I'm leaning towards 'runtime' because it's something that happens while the application is running, particularly related to how QEMU handles signal management. + +Another angle: since it involves signal handling and thread cancellation, which are runtime aspects, this reinforces the idea that it's a runtime issue rather than something at the instruction or syscall level. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |