diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1478')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1478 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1478 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1478 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2adca03a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1478 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this QEMU bug report. The user provided a lot of information, including logs and steps to reproduce the issue. Let me go through it step by step. + +First, the problem is that when using QEMU 7.2.0 with a specific toolchain (x86-core2), the system crashes during boot. The same setup works fine with QEMU 7.1.0. They also tested this against the current master branch of QEMU and encountered the same issue. + +Looking at the logs, there are several lines indicating general protection faults in libc.so.6. For example: +- traps: syslogd[52] general protection fault ip:b7e21465 sp:bfe59e6c error:0 in libc.so.6[b7d9b000+123000] +- Similarly for klogd, logger, and init processes. + +These errors suggest that something is going wrong with the system calls or memory accesses within the C library, which is a critical part of the system. + +The kernel panic message says "Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b", which means the init process crashed. This usually happens when a crucial system service fails during boot. + +The user performed a git bisect and found that the problematic commit is 958e1dd1300f37f18b2161dfb4eb806fc8c19b44. I don't have the exact details of what changed in that commit, but it's likely related to how QEMU handles certain instructions or system calls. + +In terms of classification, the bug report mentions issues with processes crashing due to general protection faults, which are related to accessing invalid memory addresses. Since these errors occur during runtime when running userland applications (like init, syslogd), and the issue is reproducible with specific toolchains and QEMU versions, it points towards a runtime error rather than an instruction or syscall issue. + +Wait, but could it be a system call problem? The GPFs are occurring in libc, which makes me think it's more about how userland processes interact with the kernel. Maybe the way QEMU is emulating certain instructions or handling memory isn't compatible with this toolchain's setup. + +Alternatively, if the issue is due to an incorrect instruction being executed by QEMU, that would fall under the 'instruction' category. But given that it's happening in libc during runtime and not during compilation or specific syscalls, I'm leaning towards a runtime error. + +So, considering all these factors, the bug is likely classified as a runtime issue. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |