diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1888728')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1888728 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1888728 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1888728 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3b1b45ae --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1888728 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down what each category means and then see where this issue fits. + +First, the user is reporting an issue when trying to run a bare chroot in QEMU's Linux-user mode. The error message they get is "pgb_reserved_va: Assertion `guest_base != 0' failed." This happens without any additional bind mounts, but it works if they bind-mount /proc from the host into the target chroot. + +The problem occurs when running the chroot command inside QEMU's static build for m68k. The error is an assertion failure in elfload.c at line 2315. Assertions usually indicate that some condition wasn't met, which suggests a programming logic issue rather than something like a hardware instruction fault or a syscall problem. + +Now, looking at the categories: + +- Instruction: This would involve issues with specific CPU instructions not being handled correctly by QEMU. For example, if an unsupported opcode caused a crash. + +- Syscall: This relates to system calls between the guest and host, such as handling of syscalls that aren't implemented or handled properly in QEMU. + +- Runtime: These are errors that occur during execution, which don't fall into the above two categories. They could include assertion failures, memory issues, etc. + +In this case, the error is an assertion failure within the elfload.c file, specifically checking if guest_base is non-zero. This suggests it's a runtime issue because it's about the program's internal state during execution. The problem isn't with a specific instruction or a syscall; rather, it's that some condition expected by QEMU wasn't met when running in chroot mode without /proc. + +Additionally, the workaround involves bind-mounting /proc, which is more related to how the environment is set up for the guest rather than any issue with instructions or syscalls. So this points towards a runtime error because it's about the state of the process during execution. + +Therefore, the category should be 'runtime'. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |