summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1907817
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1907817')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/190781713
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1907817 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1907817
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ccd99126
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1907817
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this QEMU bug report. The user provided an assertion error they're encountering after updating to QEMU 5.2.0. The error is happening in qemu-aarch64 during some operation involving TCG (Tiny Code Generator). 
+
+Looking at the details, the assertion failure is in `check_size_align` where `(maxsz & max_align) == 0` isn't satisfied. In their case, maxsz is 56. They traced this back to a specific commit which introduced changes in how `simd_desc` checks for alignment.
+
+The backtrace shows that the error occurs during some vector operations, specifically when handling FP (floating-point) or SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) instructions. The function `clear_vec_high` and others related to FP register writes are involved, suggesting it's a runtime issue during instruction execution rather than something wrong with an input instruction itself.
+
+Since the problem arises during the execution of translated code, particularly when handling certain ARM A64 instructions, it doesn't seem like a faulty instruction is being described but rather an internal error in QEMU's handling of these operations. It also isn't related to syscalls but rather to runtime processing within the emulator.
+
+So considering the categories: instruction (faulty input), syscall (system call issue), or runtime (other runtime errors). This seems to fall under runtime because it's an error that occurs during normal operation, not due to a problem with the guest code instructions themselves.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file