1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1918026 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1918026
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..52b7752d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1918026
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU's RISCV64 simulation of 32-bit AMOs (Atomic Memory Operations). Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, the user provided a test case with specific assembly instructions and expected outcomes. The tests involve using `amomaxu.w` and `amomax.w`, which are atomic operations that compare and swap integers. The issue is that after executing these AMO operations, the values in memory aren't what's expected. For example, when they run `test(&value, -11)`, the value ends up as -11 instead of staying at -7.
+
+Looking deeper, the user suggests that the problem lies in how QEMU handles these atomic operations. They mention that the function `trans_amo<op>_w` is incorrectly using `tcg_gen_atomic_fetch_<op>_tl` (which I assume stands for 64-bit operations) instead of `tcg_gen_atomic_fetch_<op>_i32` (for 32-bit). This makes sense because the AMOs in question are 32-bit, so using a 64-bit function would mishandle the data.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. The issue here isn't with a system call or an instruction being incorrect per se; rather, it's about how QEMU is handling these specific atomic operations during execution. Since the problem arises when running code that uses these AMOs and affects memory values at runtime, it seems like a runtime error.
+
+So, putting it all together: The bug report deals with how QEMU simulates certain atomic operations, leading to incorrect results when executing the program. This simulation issue occurs while the code is running, making it a runtime problem.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file