1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1331 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1331
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..685bbe49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1331
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out whether this bug report about the RISC-V sstatus in QEMU is related to user mode or system mode. Let me break it down.
+
+First, I remember that in computing, especially in operating systems and processors like RISC-V, there are different privilege levels. User mode is for regular applications, while system mode (also called kernel mode) deals with higher privileges and critical operations.
+
+The term "sstatus" stands out to me. From what I recall, sstatus is a register in RISC-V that's part of the Supervisor ISA extension. This suggests it's used when dealing with supervisor-level tasks, which are more related to system management rather than user applications.
+
+In QEMU, which is an emulator, bugs can occur in how it handles different processor states and registers. If sstatus is involved, it likely relates to how QEMU manages the supervisor state or transitions between privilege levels. This would be part of the system-level operations because it affects how the kernel or hypervisor runs.
+
+Additionally, since sstatus deals with things like mode bits (like whether the CPU is in user or supervisor mode), any bug here could impact how the operating system runs, which definitely falls under system-mode concerns. It's not something a regular application would deal with; that's more for the OS kernel or device drivers.
+
+So putting it all together: sstatus is a system-level register used in higher privilege modes. A bug related to it in QEMU would likely affect how the emulator handles supervisor states, which is part of system-mode functionality.
+</think>
+
+system
\ No newline at end of file