1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "make vm-build-openbsd' fails to notice when QEMU fails to start". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
First, let me understand what the bug is about. The user is trying to run 'make vm-build-openbsd', which is likely a Makefile target that builds or sets up a virtual machine based on OpenBSD using QEMU. The issue is that this command doesn't notice when QEMU fails to start. So, if QEMU can't start for some reason, the build process continues without detecting the failure.
Now, looking at the categories:
- Mistranslation and assembly seem related to code translation or compilation issues, which might not be the case here.
- Device, graphic, socket, network: These are more about hardware devices, graphical interfaces, networking components. Not sure if this is directly related.
- KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine; relevant since QEMU can use KVM for virtualization.
- Boot: This relates to the boot process of the VM, which might be involved when starting QEMU.
- VNC: Remote desktop protocol; possibly used by QEMU but maybe not the main issue here.
- Debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor: These could all be related, but I need to narrow it down.
The problem is about detecting a failure in QEMU starting. Since KVM is a part of QEMU for virtualization acceleration, if the bug is that the build process doesn't catch when QEMU can't start (maybe due to KVM issues), then the category might be related to hypervisor or KVM. Alternatively, it could be under 'boot' since it's about starting the VM.
But I'm thinking more along the lines of how the build process interacts with QEMU. If QEMU fails to launch, perhaps it's a problem in how the Makefile is handling the subprocess—maybe it doesn't check for QEMU's success or failure properly. Since this seems more related to the build system not detecting an issue rather than QEMU itself failing due to hardware or virtualization issues, maybe 'other' would be appropriate.
Alternatively, considering that 'make vm-build-openbsd' is part of the build process and it's about handling QEMU's start failure, perhaps it's a bug in how the Makefile interacts with QEMU. Since none of the other categories directly address the build system or script execution, 'other' seems fitting.
</think>
The issue relates to the build process not detecting when QEMU fails to start, which isn't directly tied to any specific component listed except perhaps the hypervisor aspect if it's a virtualization problem. However, since it's more about the build system handling, the most appropriate category is:
other
|