1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is that when running a FreeBSD guest on an M1 Mac using QEMU, the CPU utilization hits 100% even when the guest is idle.
First, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
The problem is about CPU usage spiking to 100%, which indicates a performance issue. So I'm thinking the category might be 'performance'. But wait, let's consider other possibilities too.
Could it be related to how the code is translated? Mistranslation usually affects specific instructions or functions, causing incorrect behavior. This seems more about resource usage rather than semantic errors.
Assembly lowering could be a factor if the issue arises from how assembly code is optimized, but again, that's more about specific operations rather than overall CPU usage.
Looking at other categories: device, graphic, network, etc., these are all related to hardware or system components. The problem here is specifically about CPU utilization, so those don't fit directly.
Hypervisor could be relevant because QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running virtual machines. If the hypervisor isn't managing resources efficiently, that could lead to high CPU usage. But since the issue is performance-related and not directly about hypervisor functionality itself, 'performance' might still be more accurate.
Kernel or peripherals: These are lower-level components, but again, the symptom points more towards overall performance rather than a specific kernel module or peripheral device.
So after considering all options, 'performance' seems like the best fit because it's about how QEMU is using CPU resources under load.
</think>
performance
|