1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's see what information we have here.
The bug report mentions an assertion failure in hw/usb/hcd-ohci.c:1297, specifically at the function ohci_frame_boundary. The user provided a backtrace which shows that the program aborted due to this issue.
Looking at the categories, I need to figure out what part of QEMU is affected here. The file hcd-ohci.c suggests it's related to the USB OHCI (Open Host Controller Interface) implementation in QEMU. OHCI is a type of USB controller used in emulators.
The function ohci_frame_boundary probably deals with timing or scheduling of USB transactions, maybe how frames are handled in the USB protocol. The backtrace shows that this function was called by timerlist_run_timers, which suggests it's part of QEMU's timer handling mechanism.
Wait, but what category does this fall under? Let me look at the list again: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
Since this is related to USB devices, which are handled as peripherals in QEMU. The OHCI controller emulates a USB host controller, so any issues here would likely be under 'peripherals'.
Alternatively, maybe it's part of the device emulation, but I think 'peripherals' is more specific because USB controllers are considered peripheral devices in this context.
So, the category should be 'peripherals'.
</think>
The bug report involves an assertion failure in a function related to USB OHCI handling, which falls under peripherals emulation.
**peripherals**
|