1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out why when I run this binary called a.out_err using QEMU, it's giving me an "Illegal instruction" error and crashing. But when I use GDB to remote-debug the same program, it works fine without any issues. That's pretty confusing because if GDB is working, maybe there's something specific about how QEMU is handling things that's causing the problem.
First, let me look at the details provided. The binary is an ELF32 file for ARM architecture, little-endian, using soft-float ABI. The entry point is at 0x8220. QEMU version is 4.0.0, which is a bit old but still maintained.
The error message from QEMU says "uncaught target signal 4 (Illegal instruction) but gdb remote-debug exited normally." That suggests that when running under GDB, the program doesn't hit this illegal instruction, but when run standalone in QEMU, it does. Hmm, why would that be?
I remember that sometimes debuggers can affect how a program runs, especially regarding certain instructions or memory accesses. Maybe there's an instruction that only gets executed when not debugging, which causes QEMU to crash.
Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The error is about an illegal instruction, so it seems like it should fall under 'instruction'. But I need to make sure it's not a different category.
If it were a syscall issue, running under GDB might still hit the same problem because syscalls are handled by the kernel regardless of debugging. Since GDB works, maybe it's not a syscall problem. Similarly, runtime issues could be many things, but since the error is specifically about an illegal instruction, that points more towards an 'instruction' category.
I'm also thinking about possible causes like CPU features or missing instructions. Maybe the binary uses an ARM instruction that QEMU doesn't support correctly in non-debug mode, but GDB somehow masks it. Or perhaps when running under GDB, certain optimizations are disabled, preventing the problematic code from being executed.
Another angle: could there be a timing issue where without GDB's介入, some initialization isn't done properly? But since the error is an illegal instruction, that makes me think it's more about the CPU executing something invalid rather than missing initializations.
So putting it all together, the main symptom is an illegal instruction causing QEMU to crash, which doesn't happen under GDB. This points towards a problem with how certain instructions are handled in QEMU when not being debugged, making 'instruction' the most likely category.
</think>
instruction
|