1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
<think>
Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
The user is running `qemu-x86_64` on an aarch64 platform and executing the 'ls' command. They're getting incorrect results when they run it. The steps involve copying the ls binary and its dependencies from x86_64 to aarch64, then using qemu to execute it.
Hmm, so what's happening here? Since they're using QEMU to emulate an x86_64 environment on an aarch64 host, any issues could be related to how the emulator is handling system calls or instructions from the binary.
The problem occurs when executing 'ls -l /'. The expected behavior is for ls to list the root directory's contents correctly. If it's giving wrong results, maybe it's not reading the filesystem properly or there's an issue with how QEMU is handling file operations.
I should consider possible causes. One possibility is that the system calls made by 'ls' are not being translated correctly by QEMU. For example, if certain syscalls aren't handled properly in the emulator when running on aarch64, that could lead to incorrect outputs. Alternatively, it might be an issue with how QEMU handles the file descriptors or directory listings.
Another angle is whether the dependencies of 'ls' are correctly set up. If any shared libraries required by 'ls' aren't present or are incompatible in the x86_64 root directory on the aarch64 host, that could cause unexpected behavior. But the user mentioned copying all necessary so files, so perhaps that's not the issue.
Looking at the categories: instruction issues would relate to specific CPU instructions not being emulated correctly. Syscall issues would be about system calls failing or returning incorrect data. Runtime errors are more general and happen during execution but aren't tied to a specific cause like syscalls or instructions.
In this case, since 'ls' is relying on the filesystem operations which involve syscalls like readdir, open, etc., it's likely that QEMU isn't correctly translating these syscalls when running in an emulated environment. If those syscalls aren't handled properly, the output from 'ls' would be wrong.
Therefore, the most probable category is "syscall" because the issue seems to stem from incorrect handling of system calls made by the x86_64 binary on the aarch64 host via QEMU.
</think>
The issue likely arises from how QEMU handles system calls for file operations in an emulated environment. Incorrect syscall translation could cause 'ls' to produce wrong results.
syscalls
|