blob: d32a53211e1e1d9d0d58c8400855874022bb329f (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU's Linux-user mode. The issue mentioned is that it requires read permissions on memory passed to syscalls when it should only need write access. Hmm, let me break this down.
First, I know that QEMU has a user-mode emulation for running unmodified Linux binaries on different architectures. It interacts with the host system by translating syscalls. Now, the problem here is about memory permissions during these syscalls.
The bug says that QEMU is requesting read access when it should only need write access. So, perhaps when certain syscalls are made, QEMU's translator incorrectly marks the memory as needing to be readable, even though thesyscall itself only needs to modify (write) that memory.
I'm thinking about how syscalls work. When a process makes a syscall, it often passes pointers to data structures or buffers. The kernel then uses these pointers to read from or write to user space memory. If the host's QEMU is enforcing read permissions when it should only need write, this could cause issues like incorrect memory access checks or even crashes.
Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime.
- Instruction would relate to an issue with how a specific CPU instruction is handled.
- Syscall category would be about problems during system call handling.
- Runtime refers to other errors happening while running the program.
In this case, the problem arises when making syscalls because of incorrect memory permission checks. So it seems related to how QEMU handles the syscalls and their associated memory accesses. Therefore, the bug is likely a syscall-related issue rather than an instruction error or a general runtime problem.
I think the correct category here is "syscall" because it's about the way QEMU interacts with system calls and how it manages the permissions on the memory passed to them.
</think>
syscall
|