1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. Let me read through it again carefully.
The problem is that when using `getdtablesize()` in user mode on Linux/alpha, the function returns a value that's too large. The user describes that `getdtablesize() - 1` should be a valid file descriptor but isn't. They provided steps to reproduce: compiling a specific C program with alpha-linux-gnu-gcc-10 and running it both directly on a Linux/alpha machine (where it works) and through QEMU, where it fails.
From the expected result, when run on the actual machine, it returns 0, but in QEMU, it returns 1. So something's wrong with how QEMU is handling this function call.
Now, looking at possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime.
The issue isn't about a faulty CPU instruction because it's more about system calls and resource limits. It doesn't seem like the problem lies in executing an incorrect machine instruction.
Next, considering if it's a syscall error. `getdtablesize()` is related to the maximum number of open files allowed. So when running under QEMU user mode, maybe the emulation isn't correctly handling this system call. If QEMU misreports the descriptor table size, that would be a problem with how syscalls are being handled.
Runtime errors usually involve issues during execution other than instructions or syscalls, like memory management or threading. But here, it's specifically about the return value of `getdtablesize()`, which points more towards system call handling.
So I think this is a syscall issue because QEMU isn't accurately emulating the behavior of `getdtablesize()` as expected in the user mode environment.
</think>
syscall
|