summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1100
blob: b642cb751ee237585ad5914572ea0b9349325904 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out whether this bug report about QEMU on the riscv64 platform is related to user mode or system mode. Let me start by understanding what each of these terms means.

User-mode emulation in QEMU typically involves running applications without a full OS, using something like qemu-user for cross-compiling binaries. System-mode, on the other hand, involves emulating an entire system with its hardware, peripherals, and often includes higher-privilege operations related to device drivers or operating systems.

The question is asking if riscv64 supports user model. Since the bug report mentions QEMU and riscv64, I think it's about whether QEMU can run user-mode applications for that architecture. If there's a bug here, it might relate to how binaries are executed in user mode without needing a full system emulation.

So putting this together, if the issue is about running user-space programs on riscv64 within QEMU, then the classification would be 'user'. If it were about emulating the entire system with devices and higher privileges, it would be 'system'. But since the question specifically asks about user model support, I think it's user-mode related.
</think>

user