blob: 2272ef06346b61d068e7747a125c4fa43898841b (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
<think>
Okay, I need to figure out whether this bug is user-mode or system-mode related. Let's start by understanding the problem.
The issue is that a QCOW2 image is growing beyond 110% of its virtual size in an oVirt environment. The VM tries to write data beyond what it should, causing an ENOSPC error because the host offset calculated is larger than the LV's actual size.
Looking at the steps provided, they involve using dd to copy an LV into a file and then setting up a test machine with that image. When starting the VM, the issue occurs immediately. The gdb trace shows the write operation is trying to access an offset beyond the image's allocated space.
The key points here are:
1. **QCOW2 Image Handling**: QCOW2 is a disk image format used by QEMU/KVM for virtual machines. Issues with how it handles file growth or writes could be in user-mode code since QEMU runs as a user-space process.
2. **oVirt and LVM Integration**: oVirt manages storage using LVM, which is part of the system's device management (system-mode). However, the specific issue here seems to stem from how the QCOW2 driver calculates host offsets during writes.
3. **Stack Trace Analysis**: The stack trace points to functions within QEMU's block layer (`qcow2_add_task`, `bdrv_driver_pwritev`, etc.), which are part of the user-mode code that handles disk I/O operations. These functions don't directly interact with hardware but manage virtual disks and their storage.
4. **Host Offset Calculation**: The problem arises because the calculated host offset (17718824960) exceeds the image's size (17716740096). This suggests a miscalculation in the QCOW2 driver when determining where to place new data, which is a logic issue within QEMU's code.
5. **Impact**: The error occurs during normal VM operation, specifically during a write operation, indicating it's not related to hardware access but rather how the image file is being managed by QEMU.
Given that the bug involves incorrect handling of virtual disk storage and the stack trace points to user-mode functions within QEMU/KVM, this issue falls under user-mode.
</think>
user
|