blob: ae73f90aa2ca409faeedf511943ae750bfd83249 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out whether this bug report is about user-mode or system-mode in QEMU. Let's start by understanding the problem.
The issue is that when someone builds a simple hello.c program using an x86_64 cross-compiler and then tries to run it with qemu-x86_64 on either an aarch64 or LoongArch host, there's no output. They provided steps to reproduce: building the binary statically, building QEMU with the x86_64 target, and running it.
Looking at the commit mentioned, it's about fixing brk() in linux-user mode to release pages. So this is related to how QEMU handles user-space processes, specifically memory management functions like brk(), which are part of the system calls made by user applications.
QEMU has two main modes: user-mode and system-mode. User-mode (like qemu-x86_64) allows running binaries for different architectures natively on the host, handling just the CPU and some basic system calls without emulating peripherals or devices. System-mode would involve full system emulation with hardware devices, etc., which isn't the case here since they're using the user-mode binary.
The problem arises when executing a binary in user-mode QEMU after a specific commit. Since brk() is a user-space function and this fix is within the linux-user part of QEMU, it's likely causing issues with how user applications run under emulation.
So, considering all that, the bug is related to user-mode because it's about executing binaries through the user-mode emulator without full system-level emulation. The issue doesn't involve higher privileges or device emulation but rather the execution of a binary and its interaction with QEMU's user-space handling.
</think>
user
|