1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
|
<think>
Okay, so I have to classify this bug report as either 'user-mode' or 'system-mode'. Let me try to understand what's going on here.
The issue is that when the user configures QEMU with gcov (for code coverage), running test 147 causes a segfault. Without gcov, it works fine. The problem occurs specifically when using ppc64-softmmu target.
Looking at the steps to reproduce: they're building QEMU with gcov and then running an iotest (test 147) which fails. Test 147 is related to NBD functionality, testing various socket connections like Unix domain sockets, IPv4, and IPv6. The error messages show that multiple tests are failing because the QMP commands aren't returning as expected; instead, they're getting 'None' where a dictionary was expected.
The system under test is running on Linux/ppc64le, using kernel 4.13.0. So it's a PowerPC architecture, which is often used in server environments or embedded systems.
Now, the problem arises when gcov is enabled. Gcov adds instrumentation to track code coverage, which can sometimes interfere with memory operations or cause unexpected behavior if not handled properly. The segfault suggests that somewhere, the program is accessing invalid memory.
Since this happens during QEMU's operation, and specifically in tests involving NBD (Network Block Device) exports, it's likely related to how QEMU interacts with networking components when built with gcov.
QEMU runs in user mode by default unless configured otherwise, but since the target is ppc64-softmmu, it's emulating a system, which typically runs in user mode or as a user-space process. However, NBD involves networking, which can interact with kernel components.
Wait, no—NBD in QEMU is usually handled within the user space because QEMU itself isn't running as a hypervisor but rather as a userspace emulator. So when it's exporting over NBD, it's using sockets and possibly interacting with the kernel's network stack. But if the test is failing due to segfaults when gcov is enabled, this might point towards an issue in QEMU's user-mode code that isn't manifesting without the instrumentation.
Alternatively, perhaps the problem arises because the way memory is being instrumented by gcov is conflicting with how certain functions are called or data structures are accessed during NBD operations. This would be more of a user-mode issue since it's specific to QEMU's execution when built with coverage tools.
But wait—could this be related to system calls? For instance, if the test relies on certain kernel behaviors that aren't being correctly handled when gcov is enabled, maybe due to stack overflows or alignment issues. However, the fact that without gcov it works fine suggests it's more about how QEMU is built with coverage.
Another angle: when building with gcov, perhaps some optimizations are disabled or code paths altered in a way that affects memory handling. The segfaults could be due to uninitialized variables or buffer overflows in parts of the code related to NBD handling.
Considering all this, the issue seems to stem from QEMU's own code when built with gcov, rather than interactions with system-level components like hardware drivers or kernel modules. Therefore, it would fall under user-mode because it's about how the QEMU process behaves in userspace when instrumented for coverage.
</think>
user
|