1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug in QEMU is a user-mode issue or a system-mode issue. Let's start by understanding the problem.
The report mentions a movdqu instruction which is causing a partial write at a page boundary. Movdqu is an x86 SIMD instruction that writes 16 bytes without alignment checks. The test code seems to execute this instruction across two pages, leading to a page fault in QEMU's TCG mode.
Looking at the output, when the program runs natively and under QEMU, there are differences. Under native execution, the write appears to complete successfully with all bytes set as expected after the page fault. However, under QEMU, some of the earlier bytes (indices 0-7) are overwritten incorrectly with values like 77, 66, etc., which suggests that the state wasn't correctly restored after handling the page fault.
Now, thinking about user-mode vs system-mode in QEMU: User-mode emulation deals with the execution of guest programs, translating their instructions into host operations. System-mode handles lower-level things like hardware devices, peripherals, and higher-privilege operations.
This bug seems to be related to how QEMU's TCG (Translation Cache) handles memory writes that cross a page boundary when a page fault occurs. Since it's about instruction execution and memory handling during program execution, it likely falls under user-mode emulation.
So, I'd classify this as a 'user' issue because it relates to the translation and execution of guest programs rather than low-level hardware or system operations.
</think>
The bug report pertains to how QEMU handles partial writes during instruction execution, specifically in user-mode emulation.
**Answer:** user
|