1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, I'm trying to figure out whether this bug report is user-mode or system-mode related. Let's break down the information given.
The issue occurs when running a specific test case from GCC's testsuite using qemu-arm for a cortex-m33 target. The error message mentions an unhandled CPU exception 0x8, which I recall in ARM architecture refers to a Hard Fault. This usually means there was an attempt to access an undefined instruction or some kind of memory fault.
The user is compiling with arm-eabi-gcc targeting bare-metal, not Linux. That suggests it's running in a system without an OS, so maybe more low-level than typical user-mode environments.
Looking at the test case, it uses nested functions, which creates trampolines on the stack. The problem arises only when compiled at -Os (optimize for size), but works at -O2. This makes me think that the issue is with how the code is generated, possibly leading to a stack overflow or incorrect pointer handling.
The user provided QEMU traces and binaries. They're executing it using qemu-arm with the cortex-m33 CPU specified. The error occurs during execution of the binary, which doesn't have higher privileges since it's bare-metal without an OS.
Now, considering system-mode vs user-mode: System-mode issues typically involve peripherals, devices, or higher privileges, often seen in OS-level operations. User-mode would be more about application-level code and its execution.
In this case, the crash is happening in user-space code (since it's a test from GCC's testsuite) running on bare metal. The issue seems to stem from how the compiled code behaves at different optimization levels. It doesn't involve system calls or device drivers but rather the CPU executing instructions incorrectly.
Therefore, I think this is a user-mode related bug because it's about the application code execution causing an exception without involving higher privilege operations or peripherals.
</think>
user
|