blob: 9b78694902ff4947a82365131cc2ced814f7fb27 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug in QEMU is a user-mode or system-mode issue. The problem reported is about floating-point emulation failing to set FE_INEXACT, which affects some math tests in glibc. Let me break down what I know.
First, the user provided test results from different architectures and environments. They ran the same code on native ppc64le and x86_64 systems, as well as under QEMU emulation for both targets. The output shows discrepancies in how FE_INEXACT is set when using QEMU versus native execution.
The issue seems to be related to floating-point operations, specifically with functions like nextafter which are part of the math library. Floating-point handling in emulators can sometimes go wrong because they need to emulate the target CPU's FPU instructions accurately.
Now, considering how QEMU works: it has two main modes—user mode and system mode. User-mode emulation allows running executables compiled for another architecture on your host machine without needing a full VM setup. System-mode is more comprehensive, emulating the entire system including hardware devices and peripherals.
In this case, the problem arises when using the nextafter function in a user-space application. The test is run as an executable that interacts with the math library functions. Since it's about how floating-point operations are handled by the emulator when running a specific binary, it seems like the issue would fall under user-mode emulation.
I remember that in QEMU, user-mode handles the execution of individual processes and their syscalls, while system-mode deals with the entire OS and hardware. The fact that the test is about math functions and not something like device drivers or kernel operations leans me towards thinking it's a user-mode issue.
The mention of fpu/softfloat.c in QEMU also points to this being related to how floating-point operations are emulated, which is part of user-mode since it deals with instruction-level emulation for applications.
So putting it all together: the bug affects how user-space applications handle floating-point numbers under QEMU's emulation. It doesn't involve system calls or hardware devices beyond what's needed to run a process. Therefore, this should be classified as a 'user' mode issue.
</think>
user
|