blob: 2d7fbd37b1cb32fad7d40064141a1c3dc203976b (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
<think>
Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned an audit of consistent option usage in the documentation. Hmm, so they're talking about how options are used across different parts of the documentation.
Now, I need to figure out if this is a user-mode issue or a system-mode one. User-mode usually deals with application-level stuff, like tools you run as a regular user without needing high privileges. System-mode involves things that require higher privileges, like kernel operations, device drivers, or interactions with hardware.
Since the bug report is about documentation consistency in options, it's more about how users interact with QEMU through command-line options or configuration files. This doesn't seem to involve low-level system functions or device handling. It's more about making sure that when someone uses QEMU, they can rely on consistent documentation for its features and commands.
So, I think this falls under user-mode because it relates to how users interact with the software through its interface rather than dealing with system-level operations.
</think>
user
|