blob: f4b2741454dc5f66fc277f0102dd42fc38acd4ea (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out whether this QEMU CPU model bug is a user-mode or system-mode issue. Let's break it down.
The problem is about the "qemu64" CPU definition in QEMU. The current setup uses AMD vendor with family 6, model 6, stepping 3. According to Wikipedia, that makes it part of the K7 family, but AMD64 was introduced in K8. So software like LLVM notices a 32-bit CPU reporting as having 64-bit capabilities.
The suggested fix is to change the family from 6 to 15 (Sledgehammer).
Now, QEMU can run in user-mode or system-mode. User-mode emulates just the CPU for running binaries without full OS support, while system-mode emulates the entire system including hardware devices and runs a full OS.
The issue here is about the CPU model affecting software's behavior when running on top of QEMU. Since the problem occurs with software like LLVM detecting an inconsistency in CPU capabilities, it seems related to how applications interact with the CPU emulation.
If this were a system-mode issue, it might involve hardware devices or higher privileges, but this is more about CPU identification which affects application compatibility. Therefore, it's likely a user-mode bug because it pertains to how the CPU presents itself to user-space programs.
So, I think it's a 'user' mode issue.
</think>
The problem arises from the CPU model affecting software compatibility in QEMU's emulation, specifically impacting applications that interact with the CPU. This falls under user-mode as it relates to application behavior rather than system-level hardware or privileges.
user
|