blob: 1f1475a8f71893dc1f23d545b79b34ec9941aa2c (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this QEMU bug is related to user-mode or system-mode emulation. Let me break it down.
The issue occurs when using user emulation with a cURL binary for aarch64. User emulation in QEMU means that the emulator runs as an unprivileged process and doesn't have access to hardware devices directly. It's typically used for running binaries of different architectures on your host machine without needing virtualized hardware.
The problem arises when connecting to a server using TLS 1.2 with a specific cipher suite, ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305. The result is a segmentation fault in QEMU 5.0.0 after applying the fix for CVE-2020-10702. They've also provided strace outputs with and without reverting a specific commit, which suggests that something changed in how user-mode handles certain operations.
Since the issue happens during user emulation, it's more likely related to how QEMU emulates the CPU or handles system calls in user space rather than anything involving hardware devices or privileged operations. The cURL command is trying to make an HTTPS connection, which would involve OpenSSL or similar libraries, but since this is aarch64, maybe there's an issue with how certain instructions are being translated or handled by QEMU.
The fact that reverting a specific commit affects the outcome indicates that the bug might have been introduced as part of fixing another vulnerability. So it's probably related to changes in the user-mode emulation code rather than system-level components like device drivers or virtualized hardware.
Also, segmentation faults in user-mode often point to issues with how memory is being managed or instructions are emulated. Since this happens when making a network connection using TLS, maybe there's an issue with how certain cryptographic operations or syscalls are handled by the emulator.
In system-mode, you'd have more involvement from QEMU's device emulation and higher-level privileges, but in user-mode, it's all about running the application binary correctly. So this seems like a user-mode related bug.
</think>
user
|