1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, I'm trying to figure out whether this bug is user-mode or system-mode related. Let me start by understanding the problem.
The user provided a program that triggers an abort signal. When they run it under QEMU using GDB, the backtrace works when hitting the breakpoint but not after the signal is triggered. They mentioned that this issue doesn't occur on real hardware and might be specific to QEMU's handling.
Looking at the setup: They're using `qemu-riscv64` with `-g 31337`, which sets up a remote GDB server. The program calls functions in a nested manner, leading to an abort(). When they run it without continuing (just hitting the breakpoint), GDB correctly shows the backtrace. But when they let the program continue and hit SIGABRT, the backtrace is incomplete—only showing the current frame.
So, why does this happen? The user thinks QEMU's signal handling differs from the Linux kernel. Maybe QEMU isn't properly setting up the stack or registers for GDB to unwind after a signal. Alternatively, perhaps the signal delivery in QEMU doesn't maintain enough context for unwinding.
Now, thinking about modes: User-mode refers to processes running without special privileges, while system-mode involves higher privilege levels, like kernel code or device drivers. This issue seems to be within a user-space program because it's about function calls and stack unwinding when a signal is triggered. GDB is trying to debug the application level, not any kernel components.
But wait, signals are handled by the OS. So does QEMU handle signals differently? If so, maybe it's related to how QEMU emulates the system call interface or handles exceptions. However, since this is about debugging a user-space program, I think the issue lies in QEMU's handling of the signal within the user process.
Thus, classifying this bug would lean towards 'user' because it's about application-level stack unwinding during debugging with GDB. The problem doesn't seem to involve kernel or device-specific aspects but rather how signals are processed in user-space.
</think>
user
|