1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
<think>
Alright, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug is user-mode or system-mode related. The issue is that when using qemu-arm-static, the ioctl call for USBDEVFS_BULK returns -1 with EFAULT (Bad address), but it works fine with qemu-aarch64-static.
First, let me understand what each part of the code does. The struct usbdevfs_bulktransfer Bulk has four fields: ep, len, data, and timeout. These are set based on hUsb->UsbOut, Len, pData, and Timeout respectively. Then, ioctl is called with hUsb->fd, USBDEVFS_BULK, and the address of Bulk.
The error EFAULT usually means that there's an invalid pointer being accessed. So, perhaps the struct or its data isn't properly aligned when passed to ioctl. Since this happens only on qemu-arm-static (which emulates a 32-bit ARM environment) and not on qemu-aarch64-static (emulating a 64-bit ARM), it might be an issue with how pointers are handled in different architectures.
Now, considering that the user is running this on a 64-bit Intel laptop, but using emulators for ARM. The problem arises when passing the struct to ioctl in the 32-bit environment. Maybe the pointer alignment or size is causing issues in 32-bit mode where it doesn't in 64-bit.
Looking deeper intoioctl calls, they can be either user-mode or system-mode depending on what they're accessing. ioctl(USBDEVFS_BULK) is related to USB device operations, which are typically handled by the kernel. So this might involve lower-level hardware interactions.
But why would it work in aarch64 but not arm? Maybe because of how pointers are passed or how the struct is aligned in memory. In 32-bit environments, pointer sizes and alignment can be more strict. If the struct isn't properly aligned when passed to ioctl, it could cause EFAULT as the kernel might receive an invalid address.
Wait, could this be a problem with how QEMU handles the emulated environment? Maybe there's an issue in how the userland code interacts with the kernel in 32-bit mode. Or perhaps the struct isn't being correctly marshaled between the user space and the kernel space when using qemu-arm-static.
Another angle: EFAULT can occur if the data buffer (pData) is not properly allocated or accessible by the process. But since it works on aarch64, it's probably a difference in how the pointer is passed or handled in 32-bit vs 64-bit environments.
Putting this together, it seems like the issue might be related to how the struct is being passed from user space (the application) through QEMU to the kernel. If there's a misalignment or an incorrect handling of pointers in the 32-bit emulation, that could cause the EFAULT. Since it's a USB operation, which involves kernel-level device drivers, but the problem occurs in the ioctl call initiated from user space, it's tricky.
I think this is more on the user-mode side because it's about how the application interacts with QEMU's system calls. The error occurs when passing data structures between the application and the emulated kernel environment, which suggests that the issue lies in the handling of these structures in user space during emulation.
</think>
user
|