blob: 4e958469fcf45c47e8a8f29fb99e8e3234e7bf6d (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out whether this bug in QEMU is a user-mode issue or a system-mode issue. Let's break down the problem.
The report mentions that when using QEMU's elf-linux-user mode to run an ELF binary created by Zig, it causes a segfault. The error happens because the ELF loader in QEMU assumes something about the virtual addresses and file offsets of PT_LOAD segments which isn't always true. Specifically, the code uses `p_vaddr - p_offset` to calculate a value 'a' for each segment and then sets `loaddr` as the minimum of these values.
Looking at the example provided by the user, the first load segment has vaddr 0x1000000 and offset 0. So a is 0x1000000. The next segment has vaddr 0x1001000 and offset 0x21000. Calculating `a = 0x1001000 - 0x21000` gives 0xfe000, which is less than the initial loaddr of 0x1000000. So loaddr gets set to 0xfe000.
But in reality, when the kernel runs the binary directly, it works fine because it doesn't make this assumption. The problem arises specifically when using QEMU's user-mode emulation. This suggests that the issue is within how QEMU handles the ELF loading in its user-mode setup.
The proposed fix changes how 'a' is calculated by masking the vaddr with the inverse of p_align -1, which effectively aligns it correctly without considering the offset. This change prevents the incorrect calculation of loaddr.
Since the problem occurs during the execution within QEMU's elf-linux-user environment and not when running natively on the kernel, it's related to user-mode emulation. The bug is in how QEMU processes the ELF file's load segments during its user-mode setup, not in system-level device drivers or higher privilege operations.
</think>
user
|