blob: cc9ddcd754c7fcc24c3be224134d93c12b9bfb5d (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU as either user-mode or system-mode related. The issue mentions "INVARIANT_RESULT" in the file "/qapi/opts-visitor.c". Let me think about what each of these terms means.
First, QEMU is a emulator that can run virtual machines. It has different modes of operation: user-mode and system-mode. User-mode emulation allows running programs compiled for one architecture on another without full OS support. System-mode emulates an entire computer, including the OS, hardware peripherals, etc.
The file "opts-visitor.c" seems to be part of QEMU's internal workings. The function or issue here is related to options processing or visitors, which are mechanisms for traversing data structures. "INVARIANT_RESULT" might relate to ensuring certain conditions hold true during this process.
Since the problem is in an option visitor file and not directly tied to hardware emulation like devices or peripherals, it's more about how QEMU processes its own configuration or command-line options. That sounds like it could be part of the user-mode setup since it doesn't involve low-level system operations or device handling.
However, I'm a bit confused because sometimes option processing can affect both modes. But given that the file is in "qapi" which relates to QEMU's API and options, I think this issue is more about how commands are handled rather than emulating an OS or hardware. Therefore, it might be user-mode related.
Wait, but system-mode also uses command-line options. So maybe it could affect both? But the question asks to classify into one category. Since "INVARIANT_RESULT" sounds like a condition that's checked during processing of these options and not tied to emulating an OS or hardware devices, I'm leaning towards user-mode.
</think>
user
|